Hey Mr. Potter this is Ryan i couldnt get my pass word for my acc so ima use Philipes this one time ok?

I think the ending of 12 angry men was well thought of but the people twisted the facts way to much to get a correct verdict , there was so much disscussion anyone would have been easiliy been persuaded that he was not guilty , they should have made there verdict from the evidence given at the very begining of the trial to go by if they went by that it would have saved time and also people did not have a reaosnable doubt that the kid was guilty , and no matter how you look at it, the boy was proved gulty by a variety of facts and witnesses that it just cant be ignored and cannot be excused by examination of the jurors , that is the lawyers job , if the lawyer doesnt do a good job then its the lawyers fault if the kid gets guilty , it shouldnt be a strain on the jurors head that the kid could be killed by electric chair after they discussed it and such. In conclusion , total bull crap they said not guilty , due to the fact they were close examining the evidence when the lawyer should have done that.